VISITAS RECIENTES

AUTISMO TEA PDF

AUTISMO TEA PDF
TRASTORNO ESPECTRO AUTISMO y URGENCIAS PDF

We Support The Free Share of the Medical Information

Enlaces PDF por Temas

Nota Importante

Aunque pueda contener afirmaciones, datos o apuntes procedentes de instituciones o profesionales sanitarios, la información contenida en el blog EMS Solutions International está editada y elaborada por profesionales de la salud. Recomendamos al lector que cualquier duda relacionada con la salud sea consultada con un profesional del ámbito sanitario. by Dr. Ramon REYES, MD

Niveles de Alerta Antiterrorista en España. Nivel Actual 4 de 5.

Niveles de Alerta Antiterrorista en España. Nivel Actual 4 de 5.
Fuente Ministerio de Interior de España

domingo, 7 de enero de 2024

Manual ABCDE para la aplicación de Primeros Auxilios Psicológicos

Manual ABCDE para la aplicación de Primeros Auxilios Psicológicos


Descarga

Download Psychological First Aid Application Handbook 




Este manual fue diseñado en el contexto del estudio “Primeros Auxilios Psicológicos: Ensayo Clínico Randomizado de adultos afectados por un trauma no intencional en una sala de emergencias”, financiado por el Centro Nacional de Investigación para la Gestión Integrada de Desastres Naturales (CIGIDEN), a través de la Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT) Chile, Programa FONDAP 
Este documento ha sido creado por:
Paula Cortés Montenegro, Psicóloga, Coordinadora de investigación.
Rodrigo Figueroa Cabello, Médico Psiquiatra, Investigador responsable.


Curso TECC by C-TECC TACTICAL EMERGENCY CASUALTY CARE . ESPAÑA http://emssolutionsint.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/curso-tecc-espana-28-septiembre-2017.html



Saber mas sobre @TACMEDEspaña  

TACTICAL MEDICINE TACMED España by EMS Solutions International


http://emssolutionsint.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/tactical-medicine-tacmed-espana-by-ems.html






SICH STRENGTHENED INDIVIDUAL COMBAT HYBRID TOURNIQUET


  GEOLOCALIZACION Desfibriladores 
Republica Dominicana 


handbook Tactical Combat Cacualty Care Lessons and Best Practices. ESPAÑOL

 

handbook Tactical Combat Cacualty Care Lessons and Best Practices


U.S. ARMY

(U//FOUO) U.S. Army Tactical Combat Casualty Care Handbook

August 22, 2010

Center for Army Lessons Learned

92 pages

For Official Use Only

REL NATO, GCTF, ISAF, MCFI, ABCA

May 2010

Download


Tactical combat casualty care (TCCC) is the pre-hospital care rendered to a casualty in a tactical, combat environment. The principles of TCCC are fundamentally different from those of traditional civilian trauma care where most medical providers and medics train. These differences are based on both the unique patterns and types of wounds that are suffered in combat and the tactical conditions medical personnel face in combat. Unique combat wounds and tactical conditions make it difficult to determine which intervention to perform at what time. Besides addressing a casualty’s medical condition, responding medical personnel must also address the tactical situation faced while providing casualty care in combat. A medically correct intervention performed at the wrong time may lead to further casualties. Put another way, “good medicine may be bad tactics,” which can get the rescuer and casualty killed. To successfully navigate these issues, medical providers must have skills and training oriented to combat trauma care, as opposed to civilian trauma care.


Casualties and wounds


On the battlefield, the pre-hospital period is the most important time to care for any combat casualty. Up to 90 percent of combat deaths occur before a casualty reaches a medical treatment facility. This highlights the primary importance of treating battlefield casualties at the point of injury, prior to casualty evacuation (CASEVAC) and arrival at a treatment facility.


Specifically, combat deaths result from the following:

• 31 percent: Penetrating head trauma

• 25 percent: Surgically uncorrectable torso trauma

• 10 percent: Potentially correctable surgical trauma

• 9 percent: Exsanguination

• 7 percent: Mutilating blast trauma

• 3–4 percent: Tension pneumothorax (PTX)

• 2 percent: Airway obstruction/injury

• 5 percent: Died of wounds (mainly infection and shock)


(Note: Numbers do not add up to 100 percent. Not all causes of death are listed. Some deaths are due to multiple causes.)


A significant percentage of these deaths (highlighted above in bold type) are potentially avoidable with proper, timely intervention. Of these avoidable deaths, the vast majority are due to exsanguination and airway or breathing difficulties, conditions that can and should be addressed at the point of injury. It has been estimated that of all preventable deaths, 90 percent of them can be avoided with the simple application of a tourniquet for extremity hemorrhage, the rapid treatment of a PTX, and the establishment of a stable airway.


On the battlefield, casualties will fall into three general categories:

• Casualties who will die, regardless of receiving any medical aid.

• Casualties who will live, regardless of receiving any medical aid.

• Casualties who will die if they do not receive timely and appropriate medical aid.


TCCC addresses the third category of casualties, those who require the most attention of the medical provider during combat.


DESCARGAR 


En caso de fallo del enlace anterior DESCARGAR aqui 

PROTOCOLO PARA LA ATENCION DEL EMBARAZO EN ADOLESCENTES MENORES DE 15 AÑOS DE EDAD pdf Gratis by gobierno de JUJUY

PROTOCOLO PARA LA ATENCION DEL EMBARAZO EN ADOLESCENTES MENORES DE 15 AÑOS DE EDAD pdf Gratis by gobierno de JUJUY

DESCARGAR 

Mas PDF sobre GINECOLOGIA, Embarazo, Obstetricia 
http://emssolutionsint.blogspot.com/2018/07/obstetricia-y-ginecologia-pdf-gratis.html

SCOOP STRETCHER VS THE LONG BACKBOARD FOR SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION

 

SCOOP STRETCHER VS THE LONG BACKBOARD FOR SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION


COMPARISON OF THE FERNO SCOOP STRETCHER WITH THE LONG BACKBOARD FOR SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION Julie M. Krell, MD, Matthew S. McCoy, MD, Patrick J. Sparto, PhD, PT, Gretchen L. Fisher, NEMT-P, Walt A. Stoy, PhD, David P. Hostler, PhD


Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Spinal immobilization is essential in reducing risk of further spinal injuries in trauma patients. The authors compared the traditional long backboard (LBB) with the Ferno Scoop Stretcher (FSS) (Model 65-EXL). They hypothesized no difference in movement during application and immobilization between the FSS and the LBB.

METHODS:

Thirty-one adult subjects had electromagnetic sensors secured over the nasion (forehead) and the C3 and T12 spinous processes and were placed in a rigid cervical collar, with movement recorded by a goniometer (a motion analysis system). Subjects were tested on both the FSS and the LBB. The sagittal flexion, lateral flexion, and axial rotation were recorded during each of four phases: 1) baseline, 2) application (logroll onto the LBB or placement of the FSS around the patient), 3) secured logroll, and 4) lifting. Comfort and perceived security also were assessed on a visual analog scale.

RESULTS:

There was approximately 6-8 degrees greater motion in the sagittal, lateral, and axial planes during the application of the LBB compared with the FSS (both p < 0.001). No difference was found during a secured logroll maneuver. The FSS induced more sagittal flexion during the lift than the LBB (p < 0.001). The FSS demonstrated superior comfort and perceived security.

CONCLUSION:

The FSS caused significantly less movement on application and increased comfort levels. Decreased movement using the FSS may reduce the risk of further spinal cord injury.


Few industries have accountability to so many people, from city councils to state and federal organizations, than EMS.  Perhaps more importantly is the responsibility EMS has to the patient and their families.


As a decision-maker, you consistently look at ways to improve your team's performance. New technologies and updated equipment have led many like you to reexamine protocols that have been in place for decades. One of those accepted protocols is the use of the long backboard for spinal immobilization. Now an independent study says that the Ferno EXL Scoop Stretcher (FSS) competes at or on the same level as the traditional long backboard, stating the Ferno EXL Scoop Stretcher "to be as effective as, if not superior to the standard of care, a rigid long backboard."

LINK TO DOWNLOAD IN PDF 

Cortesía
EMS España / Emergency Medical Services en España
@EMSESP
Follow me / INVITA A TUS AMIGOS A SEGUIRNOS
@drramonreyesdiaz
https://www.facebook.com/drramonreyesdiaz

PROTOCOLO DE ATENCIÓN PARA EL MANEJO INTEGRAL DEL EMBARAZO, EL PARTO Y EL PUERPERIO EN ADOLESCENTES MENORES DE 15 AÑOS pdf Gratis

PROTOCOLO DE ATENCIÓN PARA EL MANEJO INTEGRAL DEL EMBARAZO, EL PARTO Y EL PUERPERIO EN ADOLESCENTES MENORES DE 15 AÑOS





OBSTETRICIA y GINECOLOGIA PDF Gratis

http://emssolutionsint.blogspot.com/2018/07/obstetricia-y-ginecologia-pdf-gratis.html


Protocolos de Atencion Ministerio de Salud Publica Republica Dominicana PDF Gratis

SCOOP STRETCHER VS THE LONG BACKBOARD FOR SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION

 

SCOOP STRETCHER VS THE LONG BACKBOARD FOR SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION


COMPARISON OF THE FERNO SCOOP STRETCHER WITH THE LONG BACKBOARD FOR SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION Julie M. Krell, MD, Matthew S. McCoy, MD, Patrick J. Sparto, PhD, PT, Gretchen L. Fisher, NEMT-P, Walt A. Stoy, PhD, David P. Hostler, PhD


Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Spinal immobilization is essential in reducing risk of further spinal injuries in trauma patients. The authors compared the traditional long backboard (LBB) with the Ferno Scoop Stretcher (FSS) (Model 65-EXL). They hypothesized no difference in movement during application and immobilization between the FSS and the LBB.

METHODS:

Thirty-one adult subjects had electromagnetic sensors secured over the nasion (forehead) and the C3 and T12 spinous processes and were placed in a rigid cervical collar, with movement recorded by a goniometer (a motion analysis system). Subjects were tested on both the FSS and the LBB. The sagittal flexion, lateral flexion, and axial rotation were recorded during each of four phases: 1) baseline, 2) application (logroll onto the LBB or placement of the FSS around the patient), 3) secured logroll, and 4) lifting. Comfort and perceived security also were assessed on a visual analog scale.

RESULTS:

There was approximately 6-8 degrees greater motion in the sagittal, lateral, and axial planes during the application of the LBB compared with the FSS (both p < 0.001). No difference was found during a secured logroll maneuver. The FSS induced more sagittal flexion during the lift than the LBB (p < 0.001). The FSS demonstrated superior comfort and perceived security.

CONCLUSION:

The FSS caused significantly less movement on application and increased comfort levels. Decreased movement using the FSS may reduce the risk of further spinal cord injury.


Few industries have accountability to so many people, from city councils to state and federal organizations, than EMS.  Perhaps more importantly is the responsibility EMS has to the patient and their families.


As a decision-maker, you consistently look at ways to improve your team's performance. New technologies and updated equipment have led many like you to reexamine protocols that have been in place for decades. One of those accepted protocols is the use of the long backboard for spinal immobilization. Now an independent study says that the Ferno EXL Scoop Stretcher (FSS) competes at or on the same level as the traditional long backboard, stating the Ferno EXL Scoop Stretcher "to be as effective as, if not superior to the standard of care, a rigid long backboard."

LINK TO DOWNLOAD IN PDF 

Guía de urgencias médicas en traumatología Hospital Asepeyo Coslada. España

GRATIS: Guía de urgencias médicas en traumatología Hospital Asepeyo