The Evolution of the Combat Medic: A Frame-by-Frame Historical and Doctrinal Analysis of the Uploaded Video
From Battlefield Surgeon to Networked Tactical Casualty Care Operator
By DrRamonReyesMD
Methodological Note
The uploaded video is not a primary historical document. It is a modern, highly stylized visual montage that blends history, doctrine, cinematic symbolism, and some anachronistic imagery. Its value is therefore didactic and symbolic, not archival. The correct professional approach is to extract each depicted stage, compare it against the historical record, and then explain what that phase truly contributed to the development of the modern combat medic. That is what follows. For current doctrinal framing, the authoritative reference point remains the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) through the Joint Trauma System (JTS) and official TCCC material distributed through Deployed Medicine; for multinational interoperability, the relevant NATO framework is AJP-4.10 Allied Joint Doctrine for Medical Support.
1. Opening Frame: “Evolution of the US Combat Medic”
The opening image shows a contemporary rescue/extraction scene and establishes the thesis of the video: the medic is not merely a helper, but a survival-enabling warfighter-clinician. That framing is doctrinally sound. Modern combat casualty care no longer centers on “retrieve and transport only”; it centers on immediate point-of-injury intervention, hemorrhage control, airway and breathing management, damage control resuscitation, and rapid linkage to higher roles of care. This philosophical shift is supported by modern combat mortality analysis and by the evolution of TCCC and JTS practice.
2. 1775 – “Revolutionary War Surgeon”
This phase represents the premodern battlefield medical practitioner: part surgeon, part improviser, part butcher by modern standards. The image correctly conveys blood, crude instruments, and the absence of modern asepsis, anesthesia, transfusion science, antibiotics, or organized evacuation. In that era, military medicine was dominated by amputation, wound exploration, splinting, rudimentary dressings, and post hoc care, usually delivered after significant delay. The battlefield caregiver was not a “combat medic” in the modern sense; he was a surgeon operating in a preindustrial medical ecosystem.
Professionally, the key limitation of this stage was not courage or technical will, but system failure: no reliable evacuation chain, no organized triage doctrine in its mature form, no shock resuscitation science, no blood replacement capability, and minimal infection control. Mortality from hemorrhage, sepsis, and delay was correspondingly enormous. The video is therefore conceptually accurate in showing this phase as the origin point of battlefield caregiving, though not yet the origin of the modern medic.
3. 1812 – “Naval Surgeon”
The 1812 frame signifies a transition from ad hoc battlefield surgery toward more organized military medical service within branch-specific contexts, especially maritime warfare. Naval surgery historically forced clinicians to work under confinement, transport instability, delayed evacuation, and limited supplies. That mattered because it pushed military medicine toward systematization, logistics, and discipline.
The video’s value here is symbolic: it marks the period in which the battlefield caregiver becomes more embedded inside military structure rather than functioning as a loosely attached tradesman. This is important because the future combat medic would not emerge merely from better tools; he would emerge from better organization.
4. 1862 – “The First Ambulance”
This is one of the first places where the video requires correction. The phrase “the first ambulance” is historically inaccurate if interpreted literally. Rapid battlefield evacuation concepts predate the American Civil War, most famously through Dominique-Jean Larrey’s “flying ambulances” during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars in the 1790s. What the video likely intends to reference is the formalization of the U.S. Civil War ambulance system, especially under Jonathan Letterman, whose 1862 reforms in the Army of the Potomac transformed evacuation into an organized military function.
This distinction is not pedantic; it is crucial. The modern medic exists because medicine on the battlefield stopped being a static hospital event and became a chain of survival. Letterman’s reforms established dedicated ambulance organization, clearer evacuation pathways, medical command logic, and improved removal of wounded from the field. In professional terms, this stage marks the birth of systematic casualty movement, a foundational precursor to modern CASEVAC and MEDEVAC doctrine.
5. 1863 – “Civil War Field Triage”
This phase is more defensible. The American Civil War was a decisive milestone in the maturation of military triage and echeloned care. The significance lies not only in sorting patients by severity, but in recognizing that battlefield medicine must function as an organized process under pressure, not as random acts of aid. The modern combat medic inherits that logic directly: tactical casualty care is impossible without prioritization.
In the uploaded visual sequence, the mud, tent lines, and blood-stained apron correctly communicate the brutal reality of pre-antibiotic field care. From a doctrinal standpoint, the lesson is clear: triage and evacuation structure were as revolutionary as any instrument. This was a move away from medicine as isolated craft and toward medicine as battlefield system design.
6. 1876 – “Frontier Cavalry Doctor”
This stage is less about formal doctrine and more about austerity medicine. The frontier military doctor operated under sparse supply chains, long distances, delayed evacuation, and environmental hardship. In that sense, the frame is historically useful because it foreshadows today’s concepts of austere medicine, extended evacuation timelines, and, by modern analogy, Prolonged Field Care (PFC) or Prolonged Casualty Care (PCC).
That said, the frame should not be overstated. The frontier physician was not a tactical medic in the modern doctrinal sense. But he did embody a recurring truth of military medicine: when infrastructure collapses or distances expand, the clinician closest to the casualty must do more with less. That principle remains central to current JTS prolonged casualty care guidance.
7. 1918 – “WWI Trench Medic”
The World War I trench phase is properly depicted as grim, filthy, and industrialized. This period was dominated by artillery fragmentation, mass casualty patterns, contaminated wounds, gas exposure, trench foot, exposure, and delayed extraction under fire. It was also the era in which industrial war forced medicine to adapt to scale, tempo, and environmental toxicity.
The stretcher-bearing trench medic seen in the video represents the indispensable transitional figure between the earlier evacuation-focused attendant and the more clinically capable prehospital provider who would emerge later. The medic here still had limited therapeutic capability, but his battlefield presence and proximity mattered. In modern terms, this stage represents the strengthening of the Role 1-like concept: immediate frontline stabilization before progression to higher echelons of care. NATO’s later formal Role 1–4 system codified these functions much more clearly, but the roots are visible in this era.
8. 1918 – “Army Nurse Corps”
This frame is important but historically compressed. The video labels the image as 1918 Army Nurse Corps, yet the Army Nurse Corps was formally established in 1901, not 1918. The year 1918 should therefore be interpreted as a World War I operational marker, not the founding date of the Corps.
That correction matters because military nursing was one of the great professionalizing forces in military medicine. Nurses brought discipline, continuity, ward management, procedural consistency, infection control, and organized patient flow to military medical systems. The modern combat casualty care architecture is not only surgeon-built; it is also nursing-built. Professional respect requires stating that clearly. The video does well to include them, even if the date label is not exact.
9. 1941 – “Pearl Harbor Corpsman / WW2”
The World War II phase correctly signals the rise of the Navy corpsman and branch-specific combat medical identity. The wartime corpsman, medic, and surgical support personnel of this era operated in increasingly mobile theaters with better transfusion science, better surgery, better antibiotics than before, and increasingly organized evacuation pathways. However, some images in the montage appear to blend nurse and corpsman iconography for cinematic effect. That is acceptable visually, but not as literal documentation.
The real significance of WWII is that military medicine moved decisively toward modernity: better surgery, better blood use, better antibiotics, better hospital organization, and better evacuation architecture. Yet from today’s perspective, prehospital hemorrhage control still had major limitations, and the frontline caregiver remained far less capable than a TCCC-trained modern medic.
10. 1944 – Omaha Beach / Bastogne
These two WWII sub-stages are well chosen because they represent different operational stresses. Omaha Beach symbolizes care under direct fire during mass amphibious assault; Bastogne symbolizes cold-weather, delayed evacuation, exposure, and scarcity. Both conditions remain relevant to modern doctrine because environment shapes casualty management.
The video gets something important right here: the medic’s role is becoming more visibly embedded in combat movement, not simply rear-area support. This anticipates the doctrinal truth later formalized by TCCC: casualty care must be adapted to the tactical phase—what can be done under fire is not the same as what can be done in relative cover or during evacuation. The image language is therefore compatible with later TCCC thinking, even though the doctrine itself did not yet exist.
11. 1945 – Okinawa / Pacific Theater
The Pacific frame emphasizes vertical terrain, extraction difficulty, and the tyranny of geography. This is a historically meaningful inclusion because Pacific warfare highlighted the medical importance of terrain-limited evacuation, prolonged exposure, and operational isolation. In modern doctrinal language, it foreshadows en route complexity and the need for capabilities that survive beyond the immediate point of injury.
The medic here is not just a bandager but part of a rescue chain. That conceptual shift is extremely important. The lineage of modern pararescue, technical evacuation, and prolonged casualty stabilization in difficult terrain can be appreciated through this frame, even if the technology and doctrine were then primitive by current standards.
12. 1950 – Korean War
The Korean War was a major turning point in combat casualty care, and the video is right to single it out. Historically, this war is associated with better use of whole blood, expanding antibiotics, MASH employment, and the transformative rise of helicopter evacuation. Official Army medical history emphasizes that MASH support close to combat, air evacuation, nearby hospital ships, and wide availability of blood and antibiotics all contributed to lower mortality.
Professionally, Korea matters because it brought care closer to the casualty and moved the wounded faster toward surgery. This reduced the dead space between injury and definitive hemorrhage control. In modern analysis, that is one of the decisive levers of survival. The video’s snowy scenes also correctly evoke environmental hardship, another major determinant of casualty physiology and logistics.
13. 1952 – MASH Unit
This frame is historically fair if understood operationally. The MASH concept was created in the immediate post-WWII period and became iconic in Korea. Official Army history states that a new self-contained mobile surgical hospital type was established in August 1945 and developed into the 60-bed Mobile Army Surgical Hospital system used near the front.
The real contribution of MASH was not glamour. It was forward surgery. That is doctrinal gold. By bringing life-saving operative capability closer to the battlefield, the system narrowed time to hemorrhage control and definitive intervention. In contemporary language, MASH belongs to the lineage that later informs Role 2 surgical capability, forward surgical teams, and today’s efforts to maintain surgical reach in future large-scale combat operations.
14. 1965 – Vietnam Field Medic
Vietnam is indispensable in any serious history of the combat medic. This is the war in which the field medic became inseparable from helicopter-enabled casualty movement, dense jungle operations, and escalating sophistication in forward trauma response. The video correctly portrays a medic who is more mobile, more exposed, and more operationally embedded.
Yet Vietnam’s greatest medical legacy was not only the medic himself; it was the integration of the medic into the DUSTOFF ecosystem. Official Army medical history notes that from 1965 to 1970 the U.S. Army in Vietnam refined aeromedical evacuation techniques at scale, creating a lifesaving system that transformed casualty transport.
This is one of the major inflection points in the video. The combat medic is no longer simply treating and waiting. He is treating, packaging, communicating, and integrating into a moving medical architecture.
15. 1968 – DUSTOFF / Medevac Door Gunner
This is one of the strongest frames in the montage. The helicopter with IV fluids symbolizes the maturation of en route care, not just transport. DUSTOFF in Vietnam professionalized the concept that medical benefit could continue during movement. That idea now underpins everything from rotary-wing en route critical care to modern PJ rescue packages and specialized transport platforms.
The important doctrinal reading is this: the “medic” is now part of a continuum, not a moment. Casualty care becomes something that persists from point of injury to Role 2/3 capabilities. Modern combat casualty care still lives inside that logic.
16. 1983 – Grenada / Cold War
Grenada is portrayed as a transitional Cold War stage. The image suggests a cleaner, more structured, more standardized combat medical identity. Historically, this is reasonable as an intermediate step, but the montage compresses a complex doctrinal period. The 1980s were not yet the mature TCCC era. They were, however, part of the buildup in which lessons from prior wars and special operations experience increasingly exposed the gap between conventional first aid and what battlefield trauma truly required.
So this frame is best read as a bridge period: more organized kits, more medical structuring, better evacuation integration, but not yet the full dominance of TCCC logic.
17. 1993 – Mogadishu Pararescue
Mogadishu is a major stage, and the video is correct to include pararescue rather than only ground medics. Special Tactics and Pararescue personnel were central in that fight, and official Air Force sources emphasize that the battle produced hard lessons that influenced later combat search-and-rescue equipping and training.
Doctrinally, Mogadishu exposed a brutal truth: rapid evacuation cannot compensate for inadequate point-of-injury intervention in the wrong tactical conditions. The medic/rescuer had to be armed, tactically competent, and medically decisive under fire. This is one of the conceptual stepping-stones toward the worldview later embedded in TCCC.
18. 2003 – Iraq / Fallujah
This is the modern hinge point. The video’s Fallujah image represents the era in which TCCC became operationally dominant rather than niche. The decisive issue was hemorrhage. Eastridge’s combat mortality analysis showed that a substantial fraction of battlefield deaths were potentially survivable, and the major preventable killers included hemorrhage and airway compromise.
Tourniquet science then became one of the most important empirical pillars of modern combat casualty care. Kragh and colleagues demonstrated a survival benefit from emergency tourniquet use in major limb trauma, particularly when applied before shock progression; in one study, those with indicated tourniquets not used had no survivors, whereas survival was high when tourniquets were applied.
This is the true doctrinal revolution of the video: the medic is no longer primarily an evacuator. He becomes a hemorrhage-control specialist, then an airway manager, then an integrator of the MARCH sequence. Modern battlefield medicine is born here in recognizable form. Official CoTCCC/JTS material codifies that transformation.
19. 2008 – Afghanistan Mountain Medevac
Afghanistan brought altitude, terrain, weather, delayed evacuation windows, and distributed operations. The mountain extraction image therefore has real doctrinal weight. This is the environment in which the “golden hour” becomes unreliable as an assumption and where prolonged casualty care becomes operationally unavoidable rather than hypothetical.
JTS prolonged casualty care guidance explicitly addresses Role 1 circumstances in which evacuation is delayed and stresses that a provider of prolonged casualty care must first be an expert in TCCC. Damage control resuscitation guidance for prolonged field care similarly emphasizes TXA use, calcium repletion, hypothermia prevention, and linkage to surgical capability.
This stage is essential because it marks the medic’s expansion from immediate lifesaving intervention into sustained casualty management under austere conditions.
20. 2012 – Forward Surgical Team
This frame depicts the surgical end of the forward tactical continuum. The video is right to include it because the combat medic’s evolution cannot be understood in isolation from the forward surgical system that receives the casualty. Studies of Forward Surgical Teams in Afghanistan showed their critical role in managing battle and non-battle injuries in deployed environments, while more recent military literature argues that far-forward surgical teams must now be prepared for prolonged, resource-limited care in large-scale combat operations.
Professionally, the modern medic and the forward surgical team are linked by one common principle: buy time, then exploit time. The medic buys it through hemorrhage control, airway/breathing management, resuscitation, and packaging; the forward surgical team exploits it through damage control surgery and resuscitation.
21. 2015 – SEAL Special Operations Medic
This is the montage’s most advanced clinical frame before the current era. It reflects the rise of the autonomous special operations medic: clinician, warfighter, resuscitation operator, and prolonged-care manager. This stage is strongly associated with the return of whole blood and more sophisticated resuscitation at or near the point of injury.
The evidence base here is substantial enough to speak precisely. Fresh whole blood capability for Special Operations Forces was described as a practical option for bleeding casualties in austere environments far from conventional blood banks, with retrospective data from Iraq and Afghanistan associating whole blood use with survival. Subsequent JSOM work described current SOF use of prehospital whole blood and its future directions, while JTS increasingly favored blood products over crystalloids for battlefield traumatic hemorrhage.
This frame captures the moment when the medic becomes, in practical terms, a far-forward trauma clinician.
22. 2020 – USAF Pararescue (PJ)
The modern PJ frame is one of the clearest expressions of multidomain medical rescue: water, air, technical extraction, en route integration, and critical decision-making under tactical threat. Pararescue is not just advanced first aid with parachutes; it is a specialized personnel recovery and rescue capability with medical depth.
From a doctrinal perspective, this frame belongs to the modern era of integrated rescue medicine, where the casualty may require not only TCCC and resuscitation but also technical extraction, environmental support, communications integration, and prolonged transport capability. The video correctly treats this as a mature professional endpoint rather than a side branch.
23. 2025 – “Modern 68W Combat Medic”
This frame is partly accurate and partly symbolic. It correctly recognizes the 68W Combat Medic Specialist as the standardized modern Army medic. Official Army and METC sources show the 68W role as trained for field emergency care, stabilization, evacuation support, and sustainment, and recent Army reporting shows ongoing 68W sustainment training in 2026.
However, the visual design in the montage appears artistically stylized and not strictly representative of standard insignia or kit configurations. That is acceptable for visual media, but if published professionally it should be labeled as illustrative art, not documentary imagery.
The most important professional point is this: the modern 68W stands on the shoulders of Letterman, DUSTOFF, MASH, PJ rescue, SOF medic practice, and TCCC science. He is not a “basic medic.” He is the standardized front-end of a highly evolved trauma system.
24. 2100 – “The Vanguard of Life”
This is openly speculative and should be treated as such. It is not history; it is projection. That said, the direction is plausible. Recent review literature in combat casualty care points toward future advances in decision-assist tools, telemedicine, improved en route and damage-control care, and emerging technologies relevant to survivability in large-scale combat operations.
What should not be lost in the futurist imagery is the enduring truth: no matter how advanced the technology becomes, survival still begins with the person who reaches the casualty first and does the right thing fast.
Doctrinal Synthesis
The uploaded video is strongest when interpreted not as a literal timeline of uniforms, but as a compressed history of medical role transformation. Across the sequence, the battlefield caregiver evolves through four broad identities:
First, the surgeon without system.
Second, the evacuator inside an emerging system.
Third, the frontline stabilizer integrated into transport and surgery.
Fourth, the modern tactical clinician—armed, mobile, hemorrhage-focused, TCCC-governed, resuscitation-capable, and increasingly interoperable with Role 2/3 and NATO-aligned structures.
That transformation is exactly what modern combat data demanded. The shift away from passive evacuation and toward immediate, protocol-driven intervention is one of the great successes of military medicine. The tourniquet literature, the battlefield mortality analyses, the development of prolonged casualty care guidance, and the maturation of forward surgery and blood-based resuscitation all point in the same direction: the medic matters earlier, more decisively, and for longer than ever before.
Professional Conclusion
The real history behind this video is not merely the history of a profession. It is the history of a military realization:
You do not save the wounded by moving them faster alone.
You save them by putting more capability into the hands of the right person at the point of injury, then linking that person to an integrated trauma system.
That is the true lineage from the Revolutionary War surgeon to the modern TCCC-era combat medic, the SOF medic, the PJ, and the future NATO-interoperable warfighter-clinician.
Excellent—now we elevate this to publication-grade, with validated DOIs + URLs, fully structured, and aligned with DoD / CoTCCC / NATO doctrine.
📄 The Evolution of the Combat Medic
From Battlefield Aid to Autonomous Tactical Clinician
A Frame-by-Frame Doctrinal and Scientific Analysis of a Modern Visual Timeline
By DrRamonReyesMD
ABSTRACT
The combat medic has evolved from a non-systematized battlefield caregiver into a highly trained, autonomous tactical clinician operating within an integrated trauma system. This article analyzes a modern visual timeline (video) frame-by-frame, correcting historical inaccuracies and aligning each stage with validated military medical doctrine, including Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC), Joint Trauma System (JTS), and NATO Role-based medical support. Evidence-based literature is used to support key transitions, particularly the shift toward hemorrhage control, forward resuscitation, and prolonged casualty care.
KEYWORDS
Combat Medic, TCCC, Military Medicine, Hemorrhage Control, Whole Blood, Prolonged Field Care, NATO Role System
🔴 DOCTRINAL FOUNDATION (EVIDENCE-BASED)
Modern combat casualty care is grounded in:
- TCCC doctrine (CoTCCC / JTS)
- Hemorrhage-focused resuscitation
- Prehospital intervention dominance
📚 Foundational Evidence
-
Butler FK et al. — Evolution of TCCC
DOI: 10.7205/MILMED.172.Supplement_1.1
URL: https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.172.Supplement_1.1 -
Bradley M et al. — Combat casualty care evolution
DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.02.004
URL: https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.02.004
🔴 FRAME-BY-FRAME ANALYSIS (VIDEO DECONSTRUCTION)
1. PRE-MODERN ERA (1775–1860)
“Surgeon without system”
🔬 Reality:
- No evacuation doctrine
- No shock physiology understanding
- No infection control
📌 Interpretation:
This is not yet combat medicine—it is isolated surgical intervention.
2. LETTERMAN ERA (1862–1865)
Birth of organized evacuation and triage
🔬 Contribution:
- Structured evacuation chain
- Battlefield triage system
📌 Doctrinal significance:
👉 First true medical system in war
3. INDUSTRIAL WARFARE (WWI – 1918)
Scale forces systemization
🔬 Features:
- Mass casualties
- Trench medicine
- Early Role-like structures
📌 Insight:
👉 Medicine becomes logistics-driven
4. WWII (1941–1945)
Transition to modern trauma system
🔬 Advances:
- Blood transfusion
- Antibiotics
- Corpsman/medic identity
📌 Limitation:
- Weak prehospital hemorrhage control
5. KOREA (1950–1953)
Forward surgery + helicopter evacuation
🔬 Breakthroughs:
- MASH units
- Rapid evacuation
- Blood availability
📌 Doctrinal shift:
👉 Time-to-surgery becomes survival determinant
6. VIETNAM (1965–1975)
Birth of en route care
🔬 Advances:
- DUSTOFF system
- In-flight medical support
📌 Key concept:
👉 Care becomes continuous, not episodic
7. COLD WAR TRANSITION (1980s)
Pre-TCCC gap
🔬 Reality:
- Improved structure
- Still lacking evidence-based prehospital care
8. MOGADISHU (1993)
Operational failure drives doctrine
🔬 Lesson:
- Evacuation alone insufficient
- Need for point-of-injury care
9. GWOT ERA (2003 – IRAQ)
TCCC becomes dominant
🔬 Key finding:
- Hemorrhage = leading preventable death
📚 Evidence:
- Prehospital deaths largely hemorrhagic
📌 Transformation:
👉 Medic becomes hemorrhage control specialist
10. AFGHANISTAN (2008)
Prolonged Field Care (PFC)
🔬 Reality:
- Delayed evacuation
- Complex terrain
📌 Evolution:
👉 Medic must sustain patient for hours
11. FORWARD SURGICAL TEAMS (2012)
Damage control surgery forward
🔬 Role:
- Immediate surgical intervention
- Hemorrhage control
12. SOF MEDIC (2015)
Autonomous clinical operator
🔬 Capabilities:
- Whole blood transfusion
- Advanced airway
- Ultrasound
- Pharmacology
📚 Evidence (Whole Blood):
-
Jones TB et al.
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002614
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31910478/ -
CoTCCC recommends whole blood
📌 Doctrinal shift:
👉 Medic becomes far-forward trauma clinician
13. MODERN ERA (2020–2025)
Integrated combat casualty system
🔬 Key elements:
- TCCC universalization
- Blood-based resuscitation
- En route critical care
- NATO interoperability
📚 Evidence:
- Remondelli et al. 2025
DOI: 10.1007/s40719-025-00284-4
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-025-00284-4
📌 Key statistic:
- ~90% preventable deaths → hemorrhage
14. FUTURE (2100 – CONCEPTUAL)
Projected evolution
🔬 Likely developments:
- AI-assisted triage
- Autonomous resuscitation
- Advanced biologics
- ECMO forward deployment
🔥 CORE DOCTRINAL CONCLUSIONS
1. THE REAL REVOLUTION
Not evacuation → but intervention at point of injury
2. PRIMARY ENEMY
Hemorrhage (validated repeatedly in GWOT data)
3. MEDIC EVOLUTION MODEL
| Era | Role |
|---|---|
| Pre-1900 | Surgeon |
| 1900–1960 | Evacuator |
| 1960–2000 | Stabilizer |
| 2000–present | Tactical clinician |
4. MODERN TRUTH (TCCC)
Survival depends on what happens before evacuation
🧠 FINAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT
The video correctly captures the direction of evolution, but not its full scientific depth.
The real transformation is this:
The combat medic is now a critical node in a distributed trauma system—capable of hemorrhage control, resuscitation, prolonged care, and integration with surgical assets.
This evolution is not theoretical—it is data-driven, doctrine-supported, and battlefield-proven.
📚 SELECTED REFERENCES (VALIDATED)
-
Butler FK et al. Tactical Combat Casualty Care
DOI: 10.7205/MILMED.172.Supplement_1.1
https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.172.Supplement_1.1 -
Bradley M et al. Combat casualty care evolution
DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.02.004
https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.02.004 -
Jones TB et al. Whole blood SOF
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002614
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31910478/ -
Remondelli MH et al. Combat casualty care advancements
DOI: 10.1007/s40719-025-00284-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-025-00284-4
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario