VISITAS RECIENTES

AUTISMO TEA PDF

AUTISMO TEA PDF
TRASTORNO ESPECTRO AUTISMO y URGENCIAS PDF

We Support The Free Share of the Medical Information

Enlaces PDF por Temas

Nota Importante

Aunque pueda contener afirmaciones, datos o apuntes procedentes de instituciones o profesionales sanitarios, la información contenida en el blog EMS Solutions International está editada y elaborada por profesionales de la salud. Recomendamos al lector que cualquier duda relacionada con la salud sea consultada con un profesional del ámbito sanitario. by Dr. Ramon REYES, MD

Niveles de Alerta Antiterrorista en España. Nivel Actual 4 de 5.

Niveles de Alerta Antiterrorista en España. Nivel Actual 4 de 5.
Fuente Ministerio de Interior de España

jueves, 12 de diciembre de 2024

Guidance Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care C-TECC

 


1. Guidelines for Active Bystanders by Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC)

https://emssolutionsint.blogspot.com/2024/12/guidelines-for-active-bystanders-by.html 

2. First Responders and LEO: Guidelines for First Responders with a Duty to Act* by Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) 

https://emssolutionsint.blogspot.com/2024/12/guidelines-for-first-responders-with.html 

3 Guidelines for BLS/ALS Clinicians by Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) https://emssolutionsint.blogspot.com/2024/12/guidelines-for-blsals-clinicians-by.html 


Guidance

The Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care used the military battlefield guidelines of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) as an evidenced based starting point in the development of civilian specific medical guidelines for high threat operations. Each phase and medical recommendation of the military TCCC guidelines was examined and discussed by the Committee, and then was re-written, annotated, or removed through consensus voting of the Guidelines Committee to create civilian specific, civilian appropriate guidance. Additionally, the Committee added and/or put specific emphasis on several medical recommendations not included in TCCC to address high threat operational aspects unique to civilian operations.

TECC Phases
Direct Threat Care: Emphasis on mitigating the threat, moving the wounded to cover or an area of relative safety, and managing massive hemorrhage utilizing tourniquets. Additionally, emphasis was placed on the importance of various rescue and patient movement techniques, as well as rapid positional airway management if operationally feasible. Treatment and operational requirements are the same for all levels of providers during this phase of care.
Indirect Threat Care: Initiated once the casualty is in an of relative safety, such as one with proper cover or one that has been cleared but not secured where there is less of chance of rescuers being injured or patients sustaining additional injuries. Assessment and treatment priorities in this phase focus on the preventable causes of death as defined by military medical evidence: Major Hemorrhage, Airway, Breathing/Respirations, Circulation, Head & Hypothermia, and Everything Else (MARCHE). Four different levels of providers were assigned to scope of practice and skill sets based on level of training and certification.
Evacuation Care: An effort is being made to move the casualty toward a definitive treatment facility. Most additional interventions during this phase of care are similar to those performed during normal EMS operations.  However, major emphasis is placed on reassessment of interventions and hypothermia management.

Working Groups
Areas of the guidelines which may need future revisions/additions and medical topics that could influence or change the guidelines were identified at the December Committee meeting, and working groups on each of these were established. Each working group has been charged with examining all available literature on the topic selected and with developing recommendations for guideline changes to be presented for vote to the Guidelines Committee.

Calcium & the Lethal Triad
Defining Direct Threat/Indirect Threat
First Receivers Working Group
Implications of TECC on triage
Integration of Rescue operations and Casualty Collection Points into TECC
International Working Group
K9 TECC
Psychological Threat Mitigation
Special populations and TECC
TECC & CBRNE
TECC science

Further Research
C-TECC was founded to address a glaring operational gap that exists nationwide concerning the rescue and phased treatment guidelines during high risk operations. As part of this process, we identified several areas of patient care that still need significant research conducted before definitive guidelines can be made. This list is not all inclusive and will remain an active document as research is completed and new areas lacking data are identified. Until data can be developed, existing standards and recommendations shall remain unchanged. The identified areas of research serves as a call to our scientific and academic communities to focus funding and efforts to provide solid data on which to build the TECC Guidelines. C-TECC will not offer specific product endorsements, but strongly encourages individual agency heads and medical directors to investigate which products best meet their needs using data accumulated by C-TECC. Areas for research:

Pediatric tourniquet use

Prehospital TXA use

Resuscitation guidelines for pediatrics
Hemorrhage control in anti-coagulated patients (coumadin/plavix/etc)
Methods of evacuation and effect on survival
Physiologic monitoring of casualties in mass casualty
Effect of obesity on TECC equipment and Guidelines
Complications from needle decompression
Wounding patterns from active shooter
Effect of TBI management on hypotensive resuscitation
TEMS utilization nationally
First Responder deaths and injuries during high risk operations
Extremes of age and needle decompression

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario